Let’s start February with a question. Do gardens have to fit into a particular pattern to be “acceptable” or merit inclusion on the “must-visit” list? There are quite a few people who think they shouldn’t have to and that we’re too hung up on particular notions of culture, beauty, and good taste. They argue that gardens, like art generally, should encompass a much wider range of ideas, styles and materials and not be subject to so much analysis or or always be seen through a traditional lens, or subject to “collective” approval to be successful or interesting.
It has led to a flourishing of alternatives in galleries and gardens across the world. You might not like the results, but there’s no denying they are …lets, for the sake of argument, say …”different”
Where’s this? And NO its not on top of the White Cliffs of Dover
The Garden History Blog 
You must be logged in to post a comment.